An Appeals Court Gave the Sacklers Legal Immunity. Here’s What the Ruling Means.

Ad Blocker Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

An Appeals Court Gave the Sacklers Legal Immunity. Here’s What the Ruling Means.

On Monday, February 22, 2021, the Sackler family, former owners of Purdue Pharma, were granted legal immunity by a federal appeals court. This ruling has sparked outrage amongst those who claim the Sacklers need to be held accountable for their role in the opioid epidemic.

For years, Purdue Pharma, the company behind the addictive painkiller OxyContin, has been blamed for fueling the opioid crisis in America. The company’s aggressive marketing tactics coupled with the power of the Sackler family’s influence and wealth created a perfect storm that led to the widespread abuse of prescription opioids.

The Sackler family has been the subject of numerous lawsuits brought against them by states, cities, and tribes who are seeking compensation for the damage caused by Purdue Pharma’s products. However, in this latest ruling, the court decided that the Sacklers would be protected from any legal action related to Purdue Pharma’s business practices.

The decision was based on the fact that the Sacklers had already settled with the U.S. government for $225 million in civil fines for their role in the opioid crisis. The appeals court stated that since the Sacklers had already settled with the government, they could not be held personally liable for any further damages caused by Purdue Pharma.

This ruling has been met with mixed reactions. Some believe that the Sacklers should be held personally accountable for their actions, while others believe that the decision was fair given the settlement with the government.

However, it’s important to note that this ruling doesn’t absolve Purdue Pharma of any wrongdoing. The company is still in bankruptcy, and there are ongoing negotiations for a settlement that could be worth billions of dollars. The Sacklers are also still facing numerous lawsuits from states and local governments, which will likely proceed despite this latest ruling.

The opioid crisis continues to be a major problem in America, with thousands of deaths each year attributed to opioid overdose. The ruling in the Sackler case highlights the need for stronger laws to regulate the pharmaceutical industry and hold those responsible for the devastation caused by opioids accountable.

It’s also important to recognize the power of wealth and influence in our society. The Sacklers were able to use their vast resources to protect themselves from legal action, while thousands of families continue to suffer the consequences of their actions. This case highlights the need for systemic change to ensure that justice is truly blind.

In conclusion, the ruling in the Sackler case is a reminder of the complexity of the opioid crisis and the challenges faced in holding those responsible accountable. While the decision to grant legal immunity to the Sacklers may be controversial, it’s important to continue the fight for justice and to push for systemic change in the pharmaceutical industry to prevent tragedies like the opioid crisis from happening again in the future.