Justice Amy Coney Barrett says Supreme Court is ‘not a bunch of partisan hacks’

“My aim today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks,” the conservative Barrett said, according to the Louisville Courier Journal. She reported the large court is defined by “judicial philosophies” instead of individual political views.

“Judicial philosophies are not the similar as political events,” Barrett explained.

Barrett stated that even though she may perhaps not like final results of her decisions, “it is really not my career to decide cases primarily based on the end result I want,” the newspaper described.

“The media, along with sizzling usually takes on Twitter, report the effects and choices,” Barrett afterwards said. “That tends to make the determination look success-oriented. It leaves the reader to choose no matter whether the court was appropriate or mistaken, based on whether she appreciated the final results of the choice.”

Related: What the Supreme Court’s get signifies for the long run of Roe v. Wade

She also reported, in accordance to the Courier Journal, that she identifies as an “originalist” and citing Justice Stephen Breyer as an example of “pragmatism.”

Breyer, alongside with other justices, normally lament the public notion of the court docket as overtly political.

In a two-hour lecture at Harvard Regulation Faculty this spring, Breyer bemoaned the frequent practice of referring to justices by the presidents who appointed them and of describing the nine by their conservative or liberal approach to the legislation. Justices, Breyer reported, need to not be regarded as “junior-varsity politicians.”

Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Kentucky Republican who, as the greater part chief previous 12 months, helped steer Barrett’s nomination right after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, launched Barrett at his namesake heart.

Barrett, McConnell explained, does not try to “legislate from the bench.” He also noted she is from “Middle America” and the only latest justice to not have attended Harvard or Yale.

The Supreme Courtroom did not immediately remark on Barrett’s speech.

CNN’s Ariane de Vogue and Joan Biskupic contributed to this report.