Lululemon Sues Peloton Over Patent Infringement

Ad Blocker Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

The athletic clothing retailer Lululemon submitted a lawsuit towards the physical fitness business Peloton on Monday, accusing it of patent infringement around the layouts of a new line of leggings and sports activities bras.

The lawsuit, submitted in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, accuses Peloton of trade costume infringement, untrue designation of origin and unfair competitors. Lululemon is looking for an injunction in opposition to Peloton as very well as a jury trial, damages and other financial reduction.

Peloton and Lululemon ended a co-branding partnership this year, a split that Peloton described as amicable, in accordance to courtroom documents. Peloton released a new clothing model in September.

In its match, Lululemon said that five Peloton-branded women’s bra and legging goods, including the Strappy Bra, the Cadent Laser Dot Bra and the Cadent Laser Dot Legging, “were infringing” on 6 Lululemon patents.

Lululemon also claimed that a Peloton merchandise labeled 1 Luxe Limited was an imitation of 1 of Lululemon’s greatest sellers, the Align Pant. Legal professionals for Lululemon and Peloton did not instantly react to requests for comment on Tuesday.

“Unlike innovators such as Lululemon, Peloton did not expend the time, hard work and expense to make an primary solution line,” Lululemon explained in its criticism. “Instead, Peloton imitated many of Lululemon’s modern models and offered knockoffs of Lululemon’s items, saying them as its individual.”

The fit is the latest escalation in a dispute concerning the two well known makes. On Nov. 24, Peloton submitted a criticism in U.S. District Courtroom for the Southern District of New York, inquiring for a courtroom declaration that it experienced not infringed on any of Lululemon’s patents.

Peloton stated in its criticism that its goods “has obvious and clear variations that enable the merchandise to be simply distinguished” from Lululemon’s products and solutions.

On Nov. 11, attorneys for Lululemon despatched a stop-and-desist letter to Peloton saying that the business would sue unless Peloton stopped marketing “copy-cat products” that infringed on Lululemon’s “design patent and trade dress rights.”

In its grievance, Peloton stated that Lululemon’s “allegations lack any advantage,” incorporating that the companies’ “brands and logos are also distinctive and properly-regarded, generating confusion concerning goods a virtual impossibility.”