No charges will be filed against UFC legend Chuck Liddell after October domestic violence arrest

Ad Blocker Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

No charges will be filed against UFC legend Chuck Liddell after October domestic violence arrest

No expenses will be filed in opposition to UFC legend Chuck Liddell right after a domestic violence arrest Oct. 11, per a doc obtained by ESPN from the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s business.

The mentioned motive for why prosecution will not be pursued was “deficiency of adequate proof,” and the reviews mentioned that “the arresting officer concurs.” Both equally Liddell and his wife, Heidi, were being named in the doc as suspects, every struggling with a charge of intimate partner violence.

The scenario was classified as a “cross grievance” wherever Liddell and his spouse accused every other of becoming the aggressor in a “minor domestic violence incident.” Heidi had no obvious accidents, for every the doc, while Liddell experienced a “slight crimson mark on his cheek and a modest purple mark in close proximity to his upper body.” Law enforcement interviewed the Liddells’ daughter, who stated that she noticed her mothers and fathers pushing each and every other, but did not see who began the incident.

Liddell, 51, submitted for divorce in Los Angeles Outstanding Court docket on Friday, per online court docket data.

Los Angeles County Sheriff deputies responded to the Liddells’ Concealed Hills, California, home in the early morning several hours of Oct. 11 with regards to a domestic disturbance, for every the LA County Sheriff’s Information and facts Bureau. Following identifying there experienced been a actual physical altercation, officers took Liddell into custody on a charge of domestic battery. Liddell was launched on $20,000 bond afterwards that morning.

A couple hrs after his launch, Liddell posted a statement on his Instagram, stating that he was the sufferer but volunteered to go in his wife’s put.

“This was a person of the many periods I have experimented with to defend a spouse and children psychological wellbeing difficulty from the community purview,” Liddell wrote. “It has develop into painfully clear that this are unable to continue on, as our personal lifestyle has now attained a public breaking level. Please regard our privateness as I help to navigate our relatives by this challenging time.”