Rep. James Comer Sounds Like He’s Losing It As He Talks About DOJ Not Seriously Charging Hunter Biden

Ad Blocker Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Rep. James Comer, a Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives, recently made some rather perplexing comments regarding the lack of criminal charges against Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden. In an interview with Fox News on March 22, 2021, Comer expressed frustration with the Department of Justice (DOJ) for not pursuing charges against Biden for his alleged involvement in corruption schemes in Ukraine and China.

Comer’s comments were both bursty and confusing, leading some to question whether he is losing his grip on reality. He began by stating that the DOJ’s decision not to charge Biden was “proof positive that the deep state is alive and well.” He went on to argue that “if this were any regular American citizen, they would be in jail right now.” This is a confusing statement, as it is unclear what Comer means by “regular American citizen.” Is he suggesting that the DOJ only gives preferential treatment to members of the Biden family? Or is he implying that Hunter Biden is not a “regular” American citizen?

Comer’s comments become even more perplexing when he suggests that the DOJ’s decision not to charge Biden is part of a broader conspiracy to protect the Biden family. He claims that “the swamp is doing everything they can to protect the Bidens from any kind of accountability.” This is a bold and unsupported claim, as there is no evidence to suggest that the DOJ made its decision based on anything other than the facts of the case.

Comer’s comments also exhibit a burstiness that suggests he may be struggling to articulate his thoughts coherently. He jumps from one idea to another without explaining how they are connected. For example, he claims that “the Bidens have been involved in some of the most corrupt activities that we’ve seen in American politics,” but he does not provide any evidence to support this claim or explain how it relates to the DOJ’s decision not to pursue charges against Hunter Biden.

Comer’s comments also reveal a lack of understanding about how the DOJ operates. He argues that “the Durham investigation needs to come out and hold people accountable,” referring to an ongoing investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe. However, the Durham investigation has nothing to do with Hunter Biden or his alleged corruption schemes. It is unlikely that any findings from the Durham investigation would lead to charges against Biden.

Overall, Comer’s comments about the DOJ’s decision not to charge Hunter Biden are confusing, unsupported, and lack coherence. While it is understandable that some Republicans are frustrated with the lack of charges against Biden, Comer’s claims of a deep state conspiracy and superhuman Biden family privilege are unlikely to resonate with anyone outside of his base. It is also worth noting that the DOJ’s decision not to pursue charges against Biden is not necessarily proof of innocence. It is entirely possible that Biden engaged in corrupt activities in Ukraine and China, but that the evidence is insufficient to support criminal charges.

In conclusion, Rep. James Comer’s recent comments about the DOJ’s decision not to seriously charge Hunter Biden have been perplexing, bursty, and confusing. His unsupported claims of a deep state conspiracy and a protected Biden family lack coherence and credibility. While it is understandable that some Republicans are frustrated with the lack of charges against Hunter Biden, Comer’s comments are unlikely to change anyone’s mind or gain significant traction outside of his base. Rather than making unsupported claims, it would be more productive for Republicans to focus on substantive policy issues and let the justice system run its course.