Supreme Court to Hear Ted Cruz’s Campaign Finance Challenge

Ad Blocker Detected

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.

Mr. Cruz’s legal professionals responded that the campaign owed more funds than it had on hand on Election Working day and that it was entitled to pay out vendors alternatively than repay Mr. Cruz from pre-election contributions.


Sept. 30, 2021, 1:55 p.m. ET

“Cruz has a Very first Amendment ideal to financial loan dollars to his campaign free of charge from governmental restrictions as to amount and time of compensation,” the senator’s attorneys wrote in their short in the scenario, Federal Election Fee v. Ted Cruz for Senate, No. 21-12. “That Cruz could have avoided his $10,000 loss by refusing to personal loan his campaign extra than $250,000, or by demanding compensation in entire within 20 times, does not modify the simple fact that he experienced a $10,000 injuries by training his constitutional appropriate to make the financial loan that he did.”

The Supreme Court docket also agreed on Thursday to determine whether Boston was entitled to change down a ask for to increase a flag bearing a Christian cross on 1 of the three flagpoles in entrance of its Town Hall. That flagpole, which ordinarily flies the city’s flag, is once in a while changed by a diverse a person for a limited time immediately after an acceptance course of action.

In a 12-12 months period ending in 2017, “the town accepted 284 flag-boosting events that implicated its 3rd flagpole,” in accordance to a unanimous 3-decide panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Very first Circuit, in Boston.

“These events,” Decide Bruce M. Selya wrote, “were in relationship with ethnic and other cultural celebrations, the arrival of dignitaries from other nations, the commemoration of historic occasions in other international locations and the celebration of specified causes” like homosexual pride.

In 2017, the metropolis turned down a ask for from Camp Constitution, a team that claims it seeks “to enhance understanding of the country’s Judeo-Christian moral heritage,” which reported it sought to increase a “Christian flag” at an event that integrated “short speeches by some community clergy concentrating on Boston’s history.”

The team sued, expressing the city’s decision violated, between other things, its appropriate to free speech. The appeals court docket dominated for the city, largely on the floor that the government is entitled to opt for the messages it endorses.